Tag: Mike Nappa (Page 11 of 23)

An Editorial Team reason for rejection

A few years ago I got an email proposing a book about the life story of some remarkable woman who suffered through illness and poverty etc. before becoming a remarkable woman who still lives in illness and poverty today. Sure, somebody may be interested in reading that kind of tragic life story, but it’s not the kind of book I tend to represent. I sent a rejection.

A month later, I got an email—from a different address—about that same remarkable book about that same remarkable woman. Rejected.

Then, over the course of the next year or so, I got that same book proposal—from supposedly different names and several different email addresses—at least 20 times. Every time my response was an automated rejection. I have to wonder if, after the 13^th rejection, that author truly thought I would suddenly come to my senses and rejoice at the opportunity to represent that tired, unpublishable book. Did the author really think the 14^th rejection wouldn’t come? Or the 15^th? Or the 20^th?

Please.

Once a book is rejected, that’s pretty much it for that editor or agent. There are a few exceptions—which we’ll discuss below—but generally speaking, once rejected, always rejected. If you keep re-submitting a book after it’s been rejected, you’ve destroyed your credibility as an author with anyone who has seen your work before. 

Additionally, it makes you seem desperate and dense. If you can’t sell this book to me, I don’t want to see it rehashed and re-sent to me again. I want to see if you can come up with something else, something completely new that’ll “wow” me out of complacency toward you. I want to see that you’ve grown since your last proposal, that your writing is getting better, that your market savvy is getting keener, that you really do deserve to be published.

Otherwise we’re just a broken record that plays only one word: Rejection…rejection…rejection…

What You Can Do About It

1. Learn to accept rejection as a natural part of your writing success. 

Listen, rejection is nothing to be ashamed of in your writing career. Everybody gets rejected—and I mean everybody. Even J.K. Rowling’s first Harry Potter book was rejected by 12 publishers before Bloomsbury UK finally agreed to give it a chance. 

One of my earliest royalty books was rejected a whopping 22 times before a tiny little publisher in Minnesota picked it up—and went on to sell over 100,000 copies of it. In fact, my books have been rejected a few thousand times…and yet I’ve still managed to sell over a million copies of books I authored or coauthored. 

So if you get a rejection for a book, don’t waste time trying to change an editor’s mind or foolishly thinking you can “trick” an editor into accepting something he or she previously rejected. Life’s too short, and you’re too good, for that kind of self-defeating behavior. Accept the rejection as another step on your way to success, and move on.

2. Be aware of the exceptions to the “no re-submits” rule—but use them sparingly. 

There are rare occasions when it is acceptable to re-submit a manuscript that’s been rejected. Generally speaking, you should never re-submit a rejected proposal. But, just in case the opportunity arises for you, here are the exceptions to this rule: 

• The editor or agent suggests revisions and invites you to re-submit after changes have been made. One caveat, though: Never do more than one round of revisions for an editor in this situation. If the editor doesn’t like your book after you’ve tailored it to his or her tastes a first time, it’s unlikely to pass muster the next time.

• The editor or agent says her current load is full but she’d be open to taking another look in six months or something. This one’s easy. Wait six months and re-submit, reminding the editor that she requested the re-submission.

• There’s a change in the editorial staff and you know your book never made it to committee last time. Hey, if the rejecting editor leaves and no one else has seen your book, that means it’s a new proposal for the new editorial team. In this case, simply submit again as if for the first time.

3. Write something new.

So your book got rejected? So what? If you’re as talented and intelligent as I think you are, then simply shrug it off and start on something new. Take charge of your own success by giving yourself a brand new opportunity with a brand new book. 

And if that gets rejected too…well, so what? As long as you’re willing to try again, you’re never without opportunities.

Looking for more? Check out these links:

• Mikey Can’t Sleep blog
• Mikey Timeline
• Fan-Favorite Books
• Mikey on Amazon

An Editorial Team reason for rejection

In 1951, J.D. Salinger published what has become a classic American novel, The Catcher in the Rye—a book that’s sold over 35 million copies to date. In early 2009, Swedish author Fredrik Colting (writing under the pen name “J.D. California”) self-published his first novel through his own small publishing house. It was titled 60 Years Later: Coming through the Rye.

Colting’s book borrowed its lead character, Holden Caulfield, from Mr. Salinger’s original, imagining what might happen to this legendary antihero at age 76. (It was pretty similar to what happened to him at 16.) Colting even advertised his new book as “a marvelous sequel to one of our most beloved classics.” 

The problem? J.D. Salinger alone owns the copyright to the character of Holden Caulfield, and only he has the sole and exclusive right to publish any sequels to The Catcher in the Rye. No one else. The only exceptions would be in the case of parody or distinct literary criticism on the original work. When Mr. Salinger heard of “J.D. California” and the unauthorized sequel to his book, he objected with great gusto. 

It was not surprising, then, that in July 2009 a US District Court barred publication of Colting’s book in the United States on grounds of copyright infringement. What was surprising is that Fredrik Colting was surprised he lost in court. He appeared blissfully unaware that he was violating basic copyright law.

And that’s where you come in. 

Unfortunately a great number of aspiring writers appear to share Mr. Colting’s disregard for copyright law and rights ownership. Intellectual property laws seem to be nothing more than a minor nuisance for lawyers to worry about. As a result, copyright issues are often ignored or misapplied in an effort to achieve quick success in publishing. 

I know of authors who thought nothing of simply copying blocks of text off of Martha Stewart’s website and pasting it right into their own manuscripts. Another editor I know actually lost his job when he trusted that one of his authors had written what he’d said he’d written. Turned out that author had simply appropriated material from a Chicken Soup for the Soul book, blissfully unaware that he was violating copyright law by doing that. And the list goes on.

So here’s the deal: If you send me your next great idea, and it’s based on someone else’s original idea (a sequel to Star Wars anyone?) or if I see that you haven’t properly documented your sources, or if it’s apparent that you are mistake-prone when dealing with copyright issues … well, I’m going to reject your book. I can’t afford to face the legal liabilities that might be incurred because you are ignorant of the law.

What You Can Do About It

1. Become an expert on copyright law. 

The simple fact is that if you intend to profit from intellectual property (your writing), you’d better know how the law governs your rights to that property. 

For instance, did you know that your copyright benefits are actually a constitutional right (up there with freedom of speech and the abolition of slavery)? They are guaranteed by article 8, Section 8 of the US Constitution. And did you know that you don’t even have to publish or affix a copyright notice on your work for it to be copyrighted? In fact, putting a copyright notice on your book proposal immediately shows you are a rank amateur and someone I’ll have to educate if I sign you to a contract. As soon as you put your words into “fixed form” (such as on paper, in a computer file, on an audio recording, or even on the brim of a cowboy hat) they are solely and completely yours.

These are the simplest principles of copyright ownership. It’d be wise for you to become an expert on the rest. Here are a few resources to help you do that: 

• Intellectual Property by Roger E. Schechter and John R. Thomas (Highly recommended.)

• Kirsch’s Handbook of Publishing Law by Jonathan Kirsch

• The Public Domain by Stephen Fishman

• US Copyright Office – http://www.copyright.gov 

2. Create your own success. 

Seriously, you don’t need to depend on someone else’s writing or ideas or characters or universes or whatever. You are certainly capable of creating success on your own, without having to rip off someone else’s material. So just do that.

Don’t waste your time trying to recreate what someone else has already created. Demand more of yourself. You’ll be pleased with the result.

3. Understand the nuances of parody and “unauthorized” publishing.

Yes, it’s true that there are certain instances when you can legally appropriate material from another author and use it to create something of your own. The issues typically deal with definitions of “parody,” “criticism and commentary,” and “transformative” results. These exceptions are why you see “unauthorized” books about your favorite TV shows, or even a goofy film like Family Guy Presents: Something Something Something Dark Side. 

HOWEVER—and this is important—an attempt at parody or “unauthorized” publishing can easily cross the line into copyright infringement, so you must know what you are doing. What’s more, you must be able to clearly defend yourself in a court of law. If you intend to pursue parody or unauthorized publishing, make sure you understand the nuances of those exceptions in the law. And make sure you can satisfactorily explain for an editor how they apply to your manuscript.

This subject is too complex to deal with adequately here, so check out the copyright references listed in #1 above for more details.

Looking for more? Check out these links:

• Mikey Can’t Sleep blog
• Mikey Timeline
• Fan-Favorite Books
• Mikey on Amazon

An Editorial Team reason for rejection

There’s no law against writing a boring book … but there ought to be.

Whether you’re writing fiction or nonfiction, a children’s picture book or a teen romance, a psychology textbook or a Mediterranean cookbook, if you bore me I will reject you. 

Unfortunately for you, I have a very short attention span—and most agents and editors are just like me. We blame it on the fact that we’re very busy, our time always seems crunched, etc. etc. But the truth is just that our kind bores easily. Very little of what we read is new, and without even thinking we’re automatically dissecting your paragraph structure, the rhythm of your writing, and our emotional reaction to your words. 

You’ve got to “wow” us, and keep wowing us from beginning to end. Otherwise you’ll never keep our attention.

No, that doesn’t mean you have to have explosions and death-defying stunts on every page. But it does mean there should be some kind of “wow” factor that engages the reader—and then keeps the reader going through the book. This can be in the way you create curiosity in the reader, or in the deft characterizations you deliver, or in the thoughtful and compelling reasoning of your ideas, and so on. 

Remember, though, whatever you write, the “wow” should be easy to see. Otherwise, it’ll only take me about 60 seconds (or less) to get bored and reject your boring book.

What You Can Do About It

1. Start well. 

Bestselling novelist Harlan Ellison says, “An otherwise excellent story can find itself being stuffed back into an SASE and being dropkicked into the mail chute because it had a slow, an obscure, a confusing, or redundant opening section.” And Mr. Ellison is right.

If you intend to avoid writing a boring book, the first step is to avoid writing a boring beginning to your book. Or, to look at it another way, if you wanted to write a boring book, you’d do the following: 

Fill your opening pages with backstory and exposition. Spend a while making sure I get all the background on your characters and their setting. Tell me all about their hair color, the number of trees in their yards, where their cousins live and so on. Make me wade through all that irrelevant stuff before I can finally appreciate your plot. 

Of course, I’ll reject you…but at least you can boast about how boring your writing is, right?

2. Show, don’t tell. 

This is a basic writing instruction, especially for fiction authors. The point is this: Don’t spend time telling me something when you can engage me with a word picture or mental image of that thing instead. 

For instance, you could tell me: “Martin smoked a lot every day.” Of course, that would be boo-oor-ring. Or you could show me Martin’s habit: “Perched on the corner of Martin’s desk was a faded ash tray, filled to the edges with spent cigarette butts and surrounded by crumpled, empty packs of Chesterfields.” The first description tells me about Martin, but the second delivers a visual image that shows me Martin’s habit without ever having to say, “Martin smokes a lot.”

The problem with telling in a manuscript is that it most often is an interruptive technique. It actually stops the story in order to lecture the reader on some fact or tidbit of information. 

Think for a minute about what happens when you watch TV. Do you ever enjoy it when your favorite show stops completely to lecture you with a PSA about meth abuse, or when your football game grinds to a halt so some automotive company can tell you how tough their trucks are? As important as education about meth abuse is, and as true as it may be that some company makes tough trucks, no one likes being interrupted to hear about those things.

Likewise, telling interrupts the reader as he or she is enjoying your story. Do it too often, and your reader will eventually get bored and give up.

3. Avoid unnecessary repetition.

Veteran editors, Renni Browne and Dave King observe, “Most authors already know to edit out places where they have literally repeated a word or phrase. But the repetition of an effect can be just as problematic. Whether it’s two sentences that convey the same information, two paragraphs that establish the same personality trait, or two characters who fill the same role in the plot, repetition can dissipate your writing and rob it of its power.”

I am tempted to expand on this more, but after reading again the comments of the esteemed Browne and King, I realize that anything I say now will simply be a repeat of their excellent advice! So, suffice it to say that unnecessary repetition in a manuscript is boring. Don’t do it.

Looking for more? Check out these links:

• Mikey Can’t Sleep blog
• Mikey Timeline
• Fan-Favorite Books
• Mikey on Amazon

An Editorial Team reason for rejection

D-Train writing is a concept I learned from the inimitable Lawrence Block. It’s related to Reason #25 above, and now that I know what it is I can never again read a book that uses it within its pages—let alone pitch it to a publisher.

So take this to heart, dear reader: Never take the D-Train when you write.

Ah, you say, what exactly is the D-Train? It’s a visual image that reminds of the power of transitions in writing. It’s what happens when an author spends too much time dawdling between one scene to the next in fiction, or from one thought to then next in nonfiction. It was inspired from a rather long, detailed passage Mr. Block wrote once wrote about a character who left his Manhattan apartment and took a subway to Harlem. 

As Block explained it in his fabulous book, Telling Lies for Fun and Profit, “I was telling my readers considerably more than they cared or needed to know about something that was neither germane to my story nor interesting in and of itself—i.e. the subway system of the city of New York.”

Block’s point is this: transitions matter—and mundane, convoluted attempts to get from one place to another in a manuscript are always hard to accept. “Film and television techniques have made readers more sophisticated,” He says. “We don’t have to have things spelled out for us as thoroughly as we once did.” What’s more, a cluttered transition reveals muddled thinking and an aimless progression in a writer’s prose. Readers won’t put up with that for very long—and they shouldn’t have to.

Poor transitions also label you immediately as a novice, and to be honest, that means more work for me. If I have to teach you how to write in order to be successful representing your book, I’m going to think twice before signing you to my agency. Same goes for an editor and a publishing house. 

So close pay attention to transitions as you write. And never, never take the D-Train.

What You Can Do About It

1. Read Telling Lies for Fun and Profit. 

Seriously. Go get it.

Lawrence Block wrote this book decades ago, and there’s a reason why it’s still in print. Mr. Block is one of the few people out there who can actually take a story apart into all its little pieces and then put it back together in such a way that it’s better than it was to start. The fact that he’s willing to share that skill with you and me is our good luck. 

Telling Lies for Fun and Profit is always the book I recommend first at any writer’s conference. And people who read it are always better writers afterward. If you buy this book only to get the chapter called, “Don’t Take the D-Train,” your money will have been well spent.

2. Pay attention to your transitions. 

“Transitions are tricky,” Block says. “Transitions continue to demand that the writer make a choice, deliberate or intuitive, as to just how and where he will interrupt the narrative action and how and where he will pick it up again.”

For that reason, transitions deserve more than just your passing attention. First, as you write, keep in mind what the reader needs and wants to hear. If you find yourself writing simply to get from point A to point B, reevaluate what you’re doing. If there’s nothing in that passage that’s required for the larger story you’re telling, it may be that you’ve accidentally slipped onto the platform of the D-Train. 

Next, when you’ve finished, read your manuscript with a deliberate eye toward transitions. Identify them in your writing, and subject them to intense scrutiny. Ask yourself: “Does this transition move the story forward, or stop the story in its tracks? Does this transition effectively, and quickly, get from A to B? Or does it dawdle and meander? Are these words absolutely necessary to my story…or not?”

If you’re careful about the way you scrutinize your transitions, chances are you’ll avoid riding the D-Train—and that means you just might avoid rejection as well.

3. Read other writers, and highlight their transition passages.

Here’s a helpful writing exercise. Go out to a used bookstore and pick up a few cheap copies of your favorite books. And while you’re at the checkout counter, add a yellow highlighter to your purchase. Then take them all home and start reading.

Every time you see a transition passage that you think is effective at avoiding the D-Train, go ahead and highlight that section. Be aware that you’ll have to pay attention to see these, because good authors are adept at making their transitions almost invisible! Afterward, flip through your books and compare the passages that you highlighted. What do they have in common? What makes them successful? What techniques do you see that you can adapt and use for your own nefarious purposes? 

The best writing teachers are always other writers, so use them to help you become a pro at writing transitions in your own books. Who knows? Someday, some aspiring author may be highlighting passages of your books, looking for new ways to avoid the D-Train.

Looking for more? Check out these links:

• Mikey Can’t Sleep blog
• Mikey Timeline
• Fan-Favorite Books
• Mikey on Amazon

An Editorial Team reason for rejection

As I write this book, Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight series dominates pop culture, with books and movies and even vampire make-up styles raking in lots of money. 

As such, Twilight has created a “brandwagon” of sorts that many people are trying to use to cash in a little bit (for more on “brandwagons, see Reason #55 later in this book). Now, I have no qualms about profiting from a popular trend—in fact I often recommend it. But today I’m looking at a proposal I got recently from a pastor/author: 

“It’s Twilight for Christian teens!” he is telling me proudly. Apparently he thinks I’ll be impressed by his ability to be unoriginal and copycat another author’s idea. 

I’m not.

In fact, I’m bored by it. You see, his pitch sounds like everybody else who wants to write teen fiction right now, and enough of those unoriginal manuscripts have come across my desk to make me tired of the whole idea. 

Do you know why Twilight was published, and why it was successful? 

It was original. The author took elements of several genres—romance, horror, mythology—and combined them into something unique and compelling. That was hard for a publisher to resist, even when Stephanie Meyer was just another unknown writer with dreams of publishing a book or two. 

You must remember, when you’re pitching new books to me and my colleagues, we see hundreds (sometimes thousands) of book proposals every year. When you sift through that many manuscripts, you quickly realize there aren’t many new ideas out there. The ones that stand out aren’t books that copycat others in style or content. What gets my attention are books that deliver something original to an established audience.

Hey, Stephanie Meyer already wrote Twilight. There’s no need for you to try to do that job again, regardless of your particular slant on the topic. And if all you really have to offer me is just another unoriginal idea, then don’t expect me to give you the novelty of accepting your book.

What You Can Do About It

1. Go with the fourth idea. 

Early in my publishing career I took a low-level editorial job at a mid-sized publishing house. My boss there, Steve Parolini, was one of those rare guys who both challenged and encouraged you toward excellence. He had a profound impact on my career as a whole, and on my ability to be successful in publishing.

Part of my editorial responsibilities included writing manuscripts from time to time. I remember once he sent a manuscript back to me. Somehow, even though he expected me to do a complete rewrite, he was so tactful and helpful that I actually thanked him for tearing my writing to shreds. The one thing I remember from that session, though, was this advice he gave me: 

“Take time to brainstorm your three absolute best ideas. Then go with your fourth idea.”

What he was telling me was that I should never settle for the obvious; I should always stretch myself to create something original and new in my writing.

So now I share that same advice with you: Avoid the easily-rejected curse of being unoriginal. Come up with your three best ideas…then go with your fourth.

2. Exercise your creative muscles. 

Contrary to popular opinion, creativity is as much a learned skill as it is an innate one. So make sure that your creative muscles remain active and in good health. Spend time in deliberate pursuit of creative endeavors—stretch yourself in ways that have nothing to do with writing and you’ll see that creative effort reflected in the quality of your ideas.

For instance, try driving home from work by a different route one day. Or sample an ice cream flavor you’d never heard of before. Unpack your groceries according to color. Sort your closet by what the 10-year-old version of you would’ve liked best. Draw on a napkin. Invent a bed-making device. The only limit is your imagination! And if your imagination is in good working order, then you’re well on your way to creating an original idea that somebody like me just might want to publish.

3. Ask yourself: “What would make [Insert Author Name] want to copycat me?

The most flattering thing one author can say about another’s work is, “I wish I’d written that.” So pick your favorite author and imagine what you can create that might make that person jealous enough to say to friends, “I wish I’d written that guy’s book.”

One of my authors, Sharon Carter Rogers, always imagines that Stephen King is going to read her novels. Because of that, she has a “King Rule” in her writing. If she thinks Stephen King won’t be impressed, she doesn’t write it. To date, Mr. King has not yet read a Sharon Carter Rogers book—but at least she’s ready, just in case! 

That kind of attitude can help you overcome the blahs of being unoriginal—so keep it in mind next time you’re creating a brand new masterpiece of modern literature.

Looking for more? Check out these links:

• Mikey Can’t Sleep blog
• Mikey Timeline
• Fan-Favorite Books
• Mikey on Amazon