Tag: Mike Nappa (Page 23 of 23)

Conqueror, Exile, Missionary – Oh My!

Random thoughts, far from home...

It is not easy, this feeling of being far from home. After all, for so many decades “Home” to me was never a place, but a person. As long as Amy was there, I was “Home.” Well, cancer took that away pretty definitively, and now I find myself in some new “away” kind of place no matter where I am.

So tonight, while I watch the clock tick past 1:18 a.m., my thoughts have been churning over what it means to find “Home” when you’re far from home. I’m wondering about wandering, I guess you could say.

In Scripture, it seems there are three ways to live in an “away” place:

  • Conqueror
  • Exile
  • Missionary

The Conqueror

A Conqueror in the Bible displaces the foreign culture, forcing others to submit to his or her new way of life.

This is the “Joshua,” marching into a foreign land, seizing the territory, razing cities, destroying anyone who opposes him, subduing and enslaving whatever he doesn’t kill (see Joshua 1:10-11).

The Exile

The Exile in Scripture assimilates into the foreign culture, far from home, against his or her will, simply to survive.

This is the weeping “Jeremiah,” forced to serve the powerful, trying to follow God’s command to Israelite slaves in Babylon: “Seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile … because if it prospers, you too will prosper” (see Jeremiah 29:4-7).

The Missionary

And there is the Missionary. This person goes far from home willingly. He or she adopts the foreign culture eagerly and voluntarily.

It’s the passionate “Paul” who pursues the calling to “become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some” (1 Corinthians 9:22).

The Most Honorable Way?

My first inclination is to think of the Missionary as the only honorable way. Conqueror and Exile are certainly somehow less, right? Yet by Scriptural standards, I must face the fact that’s just not true.

Bloody Joshua is no less a hero than tentmaker Paul, and the defeated Jeremiah is just as lauded as any Missionary or Conqueror. All three men followed God wholeheartedly, and lived God-honoring lives in foreign lands.

What’s more, Christ himself incarnated into all three of those roles. He was an Exile in the world he himself created. He Conquered sickness, sin, and death. And he was a Missionary who brought news of God’s loving grace to us all. So I find myself thinking:

It’s been 2,173 days since Amy died. I am caught in this foreign land of “not home,” and it’s possible I’ll be here for the rest of my life. So…

Who am I supposed to be in this lonely, “away” place that is so far from home?

Free Reprints Logo

Looking for more? Check out these links:

If We Interpreted Email the Way Preachers Interpret the Apostle Paul

A Satirical Sermon

Good morning brothers and sisters. This blessed Lord’s day, we’ll take our text from the book of 2nd Fort Collins Email, chapter 4, verse 21. Let me read it aloud for you:

“Mike, let’s get together for coffee on Thursday at 11:00.”

Pause with me a moment for silent prayer. Lord help us understand the true meaning of the Apostle Greg’s words. Amen.

“Let’s get together for coffee,” the Apostle says to us today. I want us to dig into that Word this morning. On the surface it seems a fairly straightforward statement. Apostle Greg wants to meet his disciple Mike for a warm beverage. Ah, but there’s so much more to this command than is seen with only a passing glance.

First, notice that tiny little word, “get.” Sure, it has the implied meaning of a request to arrive at a specified place, but in 21st Century English, that word which we translate as “get” most often was used to mean “acquire,” or “obtain.” Or more accurately “to cause to be in one’s possession.”

Do you see what that means, brothers and sisters?

Apostle Greg isn’t simply asking for an appointment, but demanding possession, insisting on the acquisition of Mike’s presence and attention for some specified purpose. This is no simple request, no causal, optional obedience. The Apostle says he must “GET” together, Mike must submit to this holy unction that he and the Apostle “GET”—acquire, obtain—together. The Apostle doesn’t say “please” or “thank you” or “would you be willing?” He simply issues the command, knowing that his disciple will instantly obey, as is his expected response to the holy writ.

For what? To what purpose must the Apostle and disciple acquire together? The answer, dearly beloved, is in the next word:

“For.”

Again, in 21st Century English, that word “For” was used almost exclusively to mean, “in the service of,” or “suiting the purposes or needs of.” It was common in that culture to say things like, “I work FOR Microsoft,” meaning “I apply my time and effort to suit the purpose or needs of Microsoft.” Or to say, “She bought lunch FOR me,” meaning “She paid the cost of lunch in generous service to me.”

And again, we see the Apostle Greg revealing so much more than what we initially thought. “Let’s get together FOR coffee,” the holy man says. It’s not time to be spent for ourselves or even time to be invested in helping others. No! Read what the Scripture says! It’s time “FOR COFFEE,” a dedicated, specific obligation of our Christian lives to be in the service of coffee.

Pay attention, now church. The Apostle is saying to us: We must, on Thursday at 11:00, devote ourselves to meeting the needs of the coffee grinds in our lives. This is both our spiritual duty and our physical purpose.

“FOR coffee!” he said to his disciple Mike, and “FOR coffee” he shouts to us today. Let’s “GET” “FOR” coffee!

Somebody say Amen, because it’s awful quiet in here this morning!

Lastly, we can’t ignore this seemingly innocuous statement: “at 11:00.”

It’s important to notice two things here, beloved. First, in 21st Century American culture, that clock reference “11:00” could indicate either a time in the morning, or a time late at night. When they wanted to differentiate between the two, in that culture, they’d add a notation that was either “a.m.” or “p.m.” In that context, “a.m.” meant morning, literally anytime between midnight and noon, and “p.m.” meant night, or literally anytime between noon and midnight.

So why did the Apostle Greg delete that notation in this verse? Was it simply an oversight? An accident in the Holy Scripture? Of course not.

The answer here is obvious, and it doesn’t take a seminary degree to see it. This is something that his disciple Mike would’ve immediately understood. Apostle Greg was commanding that, every Thursday, Mike dedicate BOTH his morning AND his nights, at 11:00 exactly, to the service of coffee.

It’s that simple. And that profound. That’s what the Christian life commands for us today.

If giving our lives in service to coffee twice a day on Thursdays, at 11:00 exactly, was good enough for the Apostle Greg and his disciple Mike, then it’s good enough for you and me too.

[Dramatic pause.]

Brothers and sisters, today let’s take to heart the Word of God, spoken through the Apostle Greg to the world. From this day forward, may we be the kind of people who wholeheartedly, uncompromisingly, dedicate EVERY Thursday, at BOTH 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m., to allowing God to “acquire” and “obtain” our time as we spend it in whole-hearted service to the needs of coffee.

Let’s bow our heads in prayer to close our meeting today. And, as the Apostle commands, “Let’s GET together FOR coffee on Thursday at 11:00.”

Amen!

Free Reprints Logo

Looking for more? Check out these links:

8 Questions About Movie Ratings

A Parent’s Peek Inside the MPA Movie Ratings System

Do you have questions about movie ratings? How much do you really know about the way the MPA (Motion Picture Association) assigns ratings to films? Test yourself with these questions to find out:

  1. Are movie ratings governed by law?
  2. Who decides a movie rating?
  3. Do raters accurately represent me?
  4. Why are 13 and 17 key ages for movie ratings?
  5. Is “G” a certificate of approval?
  6. How do films get rated PG or PG-13?
  7. How do films get rated R and NC-17?
  8. So, what’s a parent to do with movie ratings?

If you hesitated on any of the questions above, then read on! In here you’ll find answers to many of your questions about movie ratings. You may be surprised by what you discover…

1. Are Movie Ratings Governed by Law?

No law requires a movie to be rated, nor is it law that a movie rating must be enforced by a local theater. The Motion Picture Association of America (MPA) and the National Association of Theatre Owners (NATO) partnered to create and implement Movie ratings as a “voluntary system” in their industry.

In other words, the film industry is responsible for rating itself. Recognizing that conflict of interest, MPA and NATO created the Classification and Rating Administration (CARA) which operates as an independent division of the MPA.

2. Who Decides a Movie’s Rating?

A “Rating Board” assigns a film its rating. This is a small group of up to 10 people appointed by the Classification and Rating Administration (CARA). Each group includes a Chairperson, Senior Raters (selected by the Chair), and Raters. The rank-and-file Raters retain their appointments for up to seven years, depending on the preference of the Chairperson.

Once appointed, Designated Raters, including at least one Senior Rater, view every film submitted. A preliminary vote follows, along with lively discussion, and then a final vote. After the committee’s final vote, the rating process is complete.

This small group, in various combinations, takes responsibility for assigning ratings to practically every movie made for commercial distribution. They assign ratings in every genre, in every style, from the newest animated Disney movie to the latest horror film and everything in between.

3. Do Raters Accurately Represent Me?

The stated purpose of the ratings system is “To provide parents information concerning the content of those motion pictures to help them determine each motion picture’s suitability for viewing by their children.” To that end, CARA requires that Raters who join the board are parents of 5- to 15-year-olds. Raters must resign when their kids turn 21—though the Chairperson and Senior Raters are exempt from that.

Some argue that proximity demographics hinder CARA’s goal of truly representing American parents, though. Out of the necessity, Raters are mostly affluent residents of the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Does that make CARA out of touch with parental concerns in more conservative and/or rural areas of the United States? Some make that complaint.

Others cry foul because different membership standards apply to the system’s most influential people, namely the Chair and Senior Raters. Does that mean CARA’s representational ability is unfavorably skewed? Again, many would say yes.

4. Why are “13” & “17” Key Ages for Ratings?

No one offers deliberate reasoning for how ages 13 and 17 became the benchmark ages selected for movie ratings. The movie industry assumes that everyone already knows and accepts why those ages were chosen.

Cultural norms suggest that the age of 13 is the beginning of adolescence, so that seems to be the logic behind separating those kids from younger ones. Assigning adulthood status to a 17-year-old high-school student is a little harder to explain.

In virtually every other legal and social context, 18 is the age of adulthood, so CARA ratings veer from the norm in this respect. In practical terms, that means CARA expects parents to accept the idea that their high-school children are adults who need no parental supervision in regard to movie-going—something that’s patently untrue. The unstated motivation here appears simply to provide a larger audience pool for R-Rated and NC-17 films.

5. Is “G” a Certificate of Approval?

According to the Rating Board, a G rating is appropriate for “all ages.” They explain:

“A G-rated motion picture contains nothing in theme, language, nudity, sex, violence or other matters that, in the view of the Rating Board, would offend parents whose younger children view the motion picture. The G rating is not a ‘certificate of approval,’ nor does it signify a ‘children’s’ motion picture. Some snippets of language may go beyond polite conversation but they are common everyday expressions. No stronger words are present in G-rated motion pictures. Depictions of violence are minimal. No nudity, sex scenes or drug use are present in the motion picture.”

6. How Do Films Get Rated PG or PG-13?

According to the Rating Board, “A PG-rated motion picture should be investigated by parents…There may be some profanity and some depictions of violence or brief nudity… [but] There is no drug use content.”

Additionally, “A PG-13 motion picture may go beyond the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, adult activities or other elements, but does not reach the restricted R category….Any drug use will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. More than brief nudity will require at least a PG-13 rating, but such nudity… generally will not be sexually oriented. There may be depictions of violence in a PG-13 movie.”

Parents should also be aware that PG-rated films released before 1984 more closely reflect the standards present in today’s PG-13 rating.

7. How Do Films Get Rated R & NC-17?

“An R-rated motion picture may include adult themes,” says the Ratings Board, “adult activity, hard language, intense or persistent violence, sexually-oriented nudity, drug abuse or other elements…Parents are strongly urged to find out more about R-rated motion pictures in determining their suitability for their children. Generally, it is not appropriate for parents to bring their young children with them to R-rated motion pictures.”

Further, “An NC-17 rated motion picture is one that, in the view of the Rating Board, most parents would consider patently too adult for their children 17 and under … NC-17 does not mean “obscene” or “pornographic” in the common or legal meaning of those words… An NC-17 rating can be based on violence, sex, aberrational behavior, drug abuse or any other element that most parents would consider too strong and therefore off-limits for viewing by their children.”

8. So, What’s a Parent to Do?

Experts offer three principles for parents in regard to using movie ratings for their families:

A) Recognize film ratings for what they are. MPA ratings deliver a general guideline created by people who may or may not share your entertainment values. They’re NOT the final authority on a movie’s content or appropriateness for your kids. YOU are.

B) Always, always refer to the “Reason for the Rating.” Visit the website, http://www.filmratings.com for reference when making parental decisions about whether a movie is acceptable viewing for your family. Here you can look up most movies (past and present) to discover why they earned their ratings.

C) When in doubt, talk it out. If you’re unsure of a movie’s content, discuss it with your kids. Examine themes, artistic appeal, your values, and reasons for the rating. Then you can make an informed decision together—and help your kid learn to discern for themselves what is, or isn’t, appropriate viewing for them.

NerdFans Free Reprints Logo

Bob Griese: In His Own Words

Few people can legitimately claim to be legends in their own lifetimes—but for Bob Griese the term “legend” is used with great regularity anyway.

Fans of the gridiron know that Bob Griese is the ONLY quarterback in NFL history to lead his team—the 1972 Miami Dolphins—to an undefeated, championship season. What’s more, this hall-of-fame QB has also achieved near-legendary status as a network television broadcaster for college football games—and he’s the father of Brian Griese, (former) quarterback for the NFL’s Denver Broncos.

What many people don’t know, however, is that this living legend has also had his share of heartache and defeat. When his wife, Judi, succumbed to cancer in February of 1998, Bob found himself both a widower and a single father. How did he cope?

Let’s find out as Bob Griese tells us in his own words…

▲▲▲

NerdFans (Us):

Thanks for joining us today, Bob. Let’s start off with your book, Undefeated, which you co-authored with your son, Denver Broncos quarterback, Brian Griese, and with biographer, Jim Denney. What first prompted you and Brian to write this book?

Bob Griese (BG):

Well, Brian and I weren’t interested in jumping and writing a book. We’re both pretty private people. I think the first blush, the first opportunity came a couple of years ago after the football season that Brian had at the University of Michigan, where they went undefeated and won the national championship.

US:

Brian was Rose Bowl MVP, right?

BG:

And I’m in the press box doing the broadcast with Keith Jackson, and Brian’s on the field, and I’d played in this same game—the Rose Bowl when I was at Purdue thirty-one years earlier. We had done five of Brian’s games earlier in the season—in broadcasting. The year before we hadn’t done any because the folks at ABC Sports didn’t want thought of conflict being in Brian the quarterback at Michigan and I’m broadcasting some of his games. So we didn’t do any Michigan games the year before, but then they relented and said, “This might be a good thing.”

US:

So now you two have taken that “good thing” and put it in book form. What was it like to work with your son on this book?

BG:

Well, it was interesting. It was fun. If you could see the way Jim Denney wrote the book, the layout, the format—

US:

It’s very conversational.

BG:

Yeah. He sat down and talked to us. He saw a competitive spirit, a back-and-forth, some kind of a special bonding, kidding that went back and forth in these interviews that he wanted to capture in the book. And that’s why he wrote the book the way he did—to capture that camaraderie, that back-and-forth that he saw when he was talking to us. And he wanted that to carry over in the book and I think he did a nice job of it.

US:

What does the title, Undefeated, mean for you and your family?

BG:

Well the term “undefeated” came from the fact that the Dolphins of 1972 won the Super Bowl undefeated; and Brian, twenty-five years later at Michigan, went undefeated and won a national championship. And [Brian’s mother] Judi, even though she lost her battle to cancer, her spirit still remains undefeated in our lives and in all the people that knew her and that she overcame cancer, and she’s still living and we’ll see her again. So I think the title, Undefeated, has a three-prong message there.

US:

Now, you and your family lost Judi to cancer when Brian was only twelve years old. What can you share with other parents about that experience?

BG:

All three of our boys—and we had three sons—they all turned out to be good, solid, Christian young men…Brian lost his mother when he was twelve, but his mother had twelve years of influence on him and I think the parents out there have to realize that they get these kids—their children—and the time to shape them is from the time they’re born until they’re about ten or twelve years old. Because once they get to be teenagers and the peer pressure and going to school and all this other stuff, you know you might lose them.

But if you have a strong foundation and be with your kids and do the right thing and teach them right thing, in the home as well in school and church or playground, that’s when you have the chance to influence your kids. And if you miss that—if you’re gone every weekend, if you’re traveling places—even though you love your kids, if you’re not around them, if you’re not with them, you’re missing an opportunity that you may regret when they’re fifteen or sixteen years old.

US:

Or even when they’re twenty-five or twenty-six, huh?

BG:

Yeah.

US:

After you lost Judi, what were your goals as a single father?

BG:

Well, I just wanted everything to be normal for Brian. And Brian was the only one that was home [then]. If it had been two or three of them at home or one of the other boys, I’d have done the same thing.

My father died when I ten, so I had been there where Brian was and I remember what my mother did for me and the things she did for me was make sure that my life didn’t change. I had lost my father but she made sure that this wasn’t a big scar on my life any more than it was losing a father—we’re not going to move, you’re not going to change doing from what you were doing. Just keep on doing what you were doing and that’s what I wanted Brian.

So we had a routine where I would get up early in the morning with him before he went to school, or his mother would always get up with him and make him breakfast and get him off to school. Now I did that, and it was a way of bonding.

US:

What kind of advice would you give to a reader who may also be struggling with the loss of a loved one in his or her family?

BG:

Well, if you have kids—if it’s a father parent and you have young kids, I’d say, “Be there with the kids and try to do as much for him to keep his routine the same.” My mother did that for me, and I did that for Brian. And now talking with him about it, I mean, that made a big difference.

US:

Of course Judi can never be replaced, but I understand you have remarried. What can you tell us about your wife, Shay and the blessings that she’s brought to your family?

BG:

Well, Shay’s a great lady. She came into our lives about four years after Judi passed away and I was hanging around with Brian a lot in the evenings, not doing much cause I wasn’t thinking about getting remarried. I’d never dated or anything like that; met Shay on an airplane and had lunch with her a couple of times, and then we started dating. But I didn’t want to do anything serious until I don’t know how much later on. [Brian] must have been sixteen, seventeen. He might have been a junior or senior in high school. He finally, he said, “Dad, you need to get yourself a friend and stop hanging around with me.” He says, “You need to get on with your life here.” So then I knew that it was time to maybe do something seriously in that regard.

US:

Well, Bob, that ends our time together. Thank you very much for sharing time and your story with the readers at www.NerdFans.com.

BG: Thank you.


NerdFans Free Reprints Logo
Newer posts »